|Shares Out. (in M):||131||P/E||0||0|
|Market Cap (in $M):||2,364||P/FCF||0||0|
|Net Debt (in $M):||449||EBIT||0||0|
There are two prior reports on ARLP (2015 and 2017) and several others on coal players (ARCH, HCC, FELP, NRP) during the past year which provide a good overview of the coal industry, its fundamental drivers, and the positioning of various players. I think now is an especially opportune time to invest in ARLP, in particular given a combination of valuation and near/medium-term catalysts.
ARLP is a producer mostly in the Illinois Basin, where it gets premium pricing for its high-heat-content coal, with a smaller percentage of its production coming out of its mines in the Northern Appalaichin Basin. It is one of only a handful of MLPs in the space, along with FELP and SXCP (not exactly comparable, but closer than other MLPs). ARLP no longer has any IDRs. I am excluidng NRP from the comparable set since it is a royalty stream/non-producer and also has soda ash and aggregates businesses.
ARLP is compelling on a valuation basis relative to its two comparables. I expect the valuation gap to close as we move through the next three quarters or so.
ARLP is trading at 4.3x ebitda and at an 11.4% (growing) distribution yield; and a 17.3% FCF yield
FELP is trading at 7.8x ebitda and at a 6.2% (stable/somewhat recently reduced) yield; 9.7% FCF yield
SXCP is trading at 6.0x ebitda and a 10.2% (recently cut) yield; and a 15.3% FCF yield
Here's why the valuation gap should close:
1) ARLP is down about 10% YTD most likely because of some congestion in the river transportation system which caused some tonnage to slip from 1Q to 2Q/3Q. But that is correcting now.
2) A recent litigation settlement of $80M (about $0.60/sahare) net of expenses improves an already strong balance sheet and gives ARLP increased financial flexibility to move forward with a meaningful capital allocation program.
3) For the capital allocation plan, I am estimating that the company would be comfortable leveraging up to 1.25x-1.5x debt/ebitda from the current approx. very low level of 0.70x. (For the right strategic fit, ARLP might be willing to go to 2.0x). But even leveraging up to just 1.25x over the next 18 months would be a big positive, provided there is a meaningful buyback component and/or investment returns in excess of the returns on the buyback.
On the 1Q conferenec call, ARLP said:
"that decision [on how to allocate excess capital above the distribution] is in front of us and we will be making that before the end of the second quarter. So we will have more color and exactly what we are going to do on our next call if not sooner"
4) they will have a PR out in the next couple of weeks announcing the finalization of the simplifiaction of their corporate structure, where there will be no more GP (current ticker: AHGP) which should make ARLP more attractive and improve liquidity.
5) the distribution is currently growing 1% per quarter. I am expecting that this could grow to 1.5%-2.0% per quarter as we enter 2019, as long as there are no major shifts in the market.
With these catalysts above (along with some others mentioned below), free cash accruing, production growth, flat/firming pricing, and the prospect of an acceleration in distribution growth in 2019, I expect ARLP to trade to at least $25 by the end of the year (approx 6x trailing ebitda and approx 8.5% distribution yield on 4Q run-rate). If you add in the balance of the distributions one will receive for the next three quarters, that's a total return of roughly 45%.
natural gas price decline
unusually warm winter weather
further transport issues, esp. in the winter.
acceleration of decommissioning of coal-fired plants
weakening of international markets
interest rate spike
|Entry||05/21/2018 11:09 AM|
have you gotten a sense for what the potential tax hit would be for unitholders if they convert to a c corp?
|Subject||Re: tax risk|
|Entry||05/21/2018 11:39 AM|
They've ruled out a c-corp at least for now as they think the tax advatages of an MLP structure are not worth giving up (see 1Q conf call for this). They are looking at the possibility of a hybrid structure that would retain the tax advantages of the MLP that some bankers are pushing. I think they are waiting a bit though on this and will consider more seriously toward the end of the year. They are hopeful that the multiple discount that the MLP space is currently getting closes relative to c-corps and want to give that a bit more time before they consider the hybrid. I believe one trigger for them to definitely go forward with the hybrid would be if some of the larger MLPs such as MMP or EPD move to shift to c-corp and/or hybrid.
|Entry||05/21/2018 06:48 PM|
Quick question, what sharecount did you use for calculating pro-forma ARLP market cap?
|Entry||05/21/2018 07:41 PM|
|Subject||A Solid Company|
|Entry||05/21/2018 07:44 PM|
I own this and was considering writing it up. This is a high quality company run by a talented, disciplined owner-manager. I too think that it deserves to sell for more than its current price. I am unsure of what moves the stock higher, but I think that it represents good value at its current price.
|Subject||Re: Re: Multiples?|
|Entry||05/21/2018 08:49 PM|
Is that the right number? I see 131M ARLP units currently. What about the pro-forma number after the simplification transaction? My quick read was that there are another 60M AHGP shares outstanding that will convert to ~88M new ARLP shares.
|Subject||Re: Re: Re: Multiples?|
|Entry||05/22/2018 09:14 AM|
The simplification took place in two stages. The first stage included those shares. 131m is the pro forma num. See this: