CESC Ventures CESCV
June 13, 2020 - 2:43pm EST by
SpringLafayette
2020 2021
Price: 167.00 EPS 0 0
Shares Out. (in M): 27 P/E 0 0
Market Cap (in $M): 58 P/FCF 0 0
Net Debt (in $M): 0 EBIT 0 0
TEV ($): 58 TEV/EBIT 0 0

Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.

 

Description

Disclaimer: This report is the work of an investment adviser affiliated with the author. The report is the result of the adviser executing its investment strategy. The adviser holds a position in the security, however there is no assurance that the adviser will continue to hold the investment or make additional investments and will not update the information to reflect future changes in the adviser’s assessment of the investment.

 

CESC Ventures (CESCV IN)

 

Holdco selling at an 80%+ discount to NAV. Non-fundamental selling, challenging market conditions and arrival of a new CEO create an opportunity for value minded long term investors. 

 

CESC Ventures was spun out of CESC Ltd earlier in 2019 and has sold off since listing due to forced selling by mutual funds constrained by SEBI regulation on large/mid/small cap categorization in a tough overall period for small cap investors.  

 

At least 18% of the company or 36% of the non-promoter shareholding was sold in the open market after the spinoff by large price insensitive institutions like HDFC Mutual Fund (18%), ICICI Mutual Fund (6.2%) and others. Actual spin-off related selling is probably higher given that ~75% of the named (largest) pre-spin shareholders exited. 

 

Post spin, the company’s FMCG business’s growth momentum has slowed because of weaker macro, actions by competitors, and management stumbles. While already an under-the-radar microcap spin-off  with no sell-side coverage, local investors have left the company for dead, creating an opportune entry point for patient investors to invest alongside a new CEO that left a much larger business to come and grow CESCV’s FMCG foray.  

 

While the value of non-FMCG businesses and a blown-out holdCo discount offer a margin a safety and considerable downside protection, we believe that CESCV offers a path to non-linear VC type returns if new management succeeds, an outcome that is far from priced in at today’s prices. 

 

Large discount to Net Asset Value

CESC Ventures trades at an 81% discount to fair “net asset value” on a SOTP Basis, calculated conservatively

 

 

On a look through basis, CESC Ventures trades at a 33.4% FCF yield ex-FMCG if you assume FirstSource (FSOL) pays out ~50% of NI as dividends to CESC Ventures. While HoldCo discounts in India are elevated relative to historical levels, the median discount today is 45% for active controlling stakes (i.e. Holding companies that actively turn over their portfolio by buying/selling assets) and below 75% for non-controlling stakes. It is very rare to find HoldCos at discounts of 80% and HoldCos with this level of discount typically have corporate governance problems, with no chance of a collapse or conversion to an OpCo (events that could help NAV realization)

 

With that in mind, based on our work we think that it is unlikely that CESC Ventures’s HoldCo discount will widen further.

 

 On the other hand, if the FMCG business succeeds in doubling its revenues, is spun out, and trades at a 4-5x revenue multiple in line with larger peers, CESC Ventures could offer 10x upside from current levels over the next 5 years.

 

FMCG business – new CEO turning around momentum is a source of non-linear upside 

 

Post spin, the FMCG business, TooYumm, was headed by ex-McKinsey partner Suhail Sameer. While he succeeded in helping the brand gain initial traction by roping in local celebrities such as cricketer Virat Kohli, TooYumm’s growth has slowed down in recent months, as a result of a weak macro environment (especially for challenger brands) and some self-inflicted management issues. 

 

The RPG group remains committed to building scale in the FMCG business such that it is the next growth engine for the multi-billion dollar group, and our LinkedIn sleuthing has revealed that the company has already hired a new CEO from global FMCG giant Reckitt Benckiser, where he managed a business that was >10x the annual sales of TooYumm 

 

 

CESC Ventures plans on using the cashflow generated from its mall in Kolkata and dividends from FirstSource to fund growth for TooYumm, which has grown to over 200cr in annual sales since its founding in 2017. 

 

BPO business and Real Estate – underappreciated, steady cash-generative assets protecting downside

Since FSOL is publicly traded we won’t analyze it in detail, but we believe that FSOL could be an underappreciated source of upside and expect EBITDA to grow at a low double-digit pace over the next few years. 

 

FSOL’s high dividend payout should provide a solid floor on the stock, while its modest valuation of 8x EPS is a large discount to comparable BPOs and leaves room for multiple expansion from currently depressed levels. Over the longer term, we’d expect FSOL to benefit from the increasing consolidation in the currently fragmented sector. 

 

 

 

Quest is the premier mall in east India and given the near-term headwinds, we value it at an 11% cap-rate which should grow at 4-5% a year. While Quest is operating at full occupancy (~99%), there is upside from re-pricing of the preliminary contracts signed by tenants when the mall was created. This could potentially cause rents to increase 20-30% over the next few years as leases expire. 

 

Unlike the developed market, malls are structurally underbuilt and growing in India, and there is a scarcity value to the type of class-A+ asset that Quest holds (see listed peer Pheonix Mills for example). Longer term, the current level of low interest rates in India should provide a boost to commercial property values, although we bake in little of this benefit at our assumed valuation multiple. 



We believe Sanjiv Goenka is a better capital allocator than the market thinks

 

Our conversations with other buyside and sell side participants suggest that Mr. Market views Goenka favorably on corporate governance but has a neutral to negative view on Goenka’s capital allocation. Goenka’s flagship company is CESC. While CESC’s shareholder returns over the long term have been in-line with indices, CESC has meaningfully outperformed power peers over the last 10 years 

 

While power peers extrapolated the boom seen in power from 2003 to 2007 and engaged in leverage fueled capex to build out power plants, Goenka remained conservative while bidding for new projects. CESC continued to operate at 2-3x Debt/EBITDA while peer median leverage was ~5-6x Debt/EBITDA and the company’s balance sheet was described by analysts as “under-leveraged” and “conservative” at the time. This proved to be a winning strategy as CESC Ventures has meaningfully outperformed peers in its sector, including Reliance Power, Rattan Power, Tata Power, Torrent power, NTPC, and others. 

 

CESC’s non-core investments in FirstSource and Quest Properties (Kolkata Mall and BKC assets) have been homeruns with +334% (CAGR of 23.8% incl. dividends reinvested) and +80% returns (not including interim cashflow) to date. 

 

Even Goenka’s poor investments were driven by industry-wide issues rather than poor execution or high entry valuation. While investors criticize Sanjiv Goenka for the Spencers acquisition in hindsight, there was significant excitement around the stock and CESC greatly outperformed its power peers when Spencers was acquired.

 

 

 

The valuation paid for Spencers at 1.7x EV/TTM sales was significantly below Future Retail (3.2x)’s and V2Retail (2.9x)’s trading multiple even though the asset was acquired from Sanjiv Goenka himself.

Analysts were bullish on the space and generally applauded CESC’s use of capital into retail.

 

Spencers did not meaningfully underperform organized retail peers from the period. For example, both Vishal Mega Mart and Subhiksha Retail went bankrupt. Industry wide profitability was extremely lack-luster due to massive overinvestments. Profitability in the space has only started coming back as of late:

 

Note how aggregate industry profits were negative until 2016 due to the aggressive competition by existing retail players despite massive revenue growth



Hard catalyst to reduce holdco discount

 

We believe that the FMCG business will eventually be spun off and exit the HoldCo. This will provide a hard catalyst for reduction in the HoldCo discount. Sanjiv Goenka has publicly mentioned plans to separate out the business once it reaches maturity. The spinoff of noncore investments at CESC which created the CESCV entity in the first place provides further evidence that Goenka is willing to separate out group companies to maximize value.  

 

Conclusion

We think CESCV offers a very interesting risk-reward skew for investors who are not constrained by market cap and have a 2 to 3 year time horizon: TooYumm is a very young company with dynamic leadership, and it will suffer missteps and pivot business models along the way, even if it is successful at building a lasting FMCG brand in the end.  Either TooYumm does so-so/fails and you get your money back, or TooYumm works and CESC Ventures is a multi-bagger as the NAV discount closes, underlying NAV grows, and the market wakes up to CESC Ventures’s demerger/spin-off plans.

 

Others may also be seeing value as small/mid-cap stock pickers like Ashish Dhawan (personally and through Ellipsis Partners owns 5% of company) and Arvind Khattar (1.2% stake) have been buying shares of CESC Ventures. 

 

Assigning a fair 45% HoldCo discount to CESC Ventures’s net asset value would result in 2.89x MoM or +189% upside and if the FMCG business succeeds and is spun out, CESC Ventures could offer a 10x return over the next 5 years from current levels

 

I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy.
I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.

Catalyst

FMCG traction 

Share buybacks

Spin-off of FMCG

    show   sort by    
      Back to top