|Shares Out. (in M):||0||P/E|
|Market Cap (in $M):||3,900||P/FCF|
|Net Debt (in $M):||0||EBIT||0||0|
Crown Holdings (CCK) is a word leader in metal packaging—primarily beverage cans and food cans. The company survived a near death experience earlier in the decade for a combination of reasons well-chronicled in a VIC analysis dated early in 2004. By the way, the stock has generated an IRR of almost 30% since that point despite its recent lackluster performance.
This is a simple story: High cash generation in a largely international, oligopolistic, recession-resistant industry with management that has done the right thing over the last five years and is rewarded to do the right thing—incentive programs are chiefly tied to year to year improvement in return on invested capital. On my estimates, CCK will generate a 10.5% free cash flow yield next year. Management is on record as saying that they will begin to devote a higher percentage of free cash flow to share buybacks as net debt:EBITDA reaches the 3:1 threshold. In 2006 and 2007 roundly 1/3 of FCF has gone toward buybacks with the rest toward debt repayment; this should rise to 2/3 in 2008, or about 6% of the current share base assuming a mid-$20’s purchase price.
Looking out three years to the end of 2010 as an investment horizon and assuming CCK continues to buy back stock with 2/3 of its free cash, the company would have 140MM shares, a reduction of 17% from current levels and, of course, the balance sheet would be somewhat stronger. By then, free cash/share should have risen to $3.30. Using the same capitalization rate as today that would produce a 13% compounded return—OK but not great. If one assumes, though, that the FCF yield drops to 8%, the stock would go to $40, of a compounded return of 21%/year. I think that’s very attractive for a business with relatively low risk characteristics.
After a series of divestitures In recent years, CCK is almost entirely focused on beverage and food cans. Worldwide, Crown is #1 in food cans, #1 in aerosol cans, #2 in metal vacuum closures, and #3 in beverage cans. There are high barriers to entry across the business mix and shipping product long distances is uneconomic. Both markets have evolved into oligopolies over the last decade. As noted above, Crown is very international and thus a beneficiary of the weaker dollar: In 2006, 72% of sales were outside of the United States and rapid growth in emerging markets should push this number higher going forward. In the last couple of years, for example, new plants have been opened in
Management is adamant that Crown is not interested in acquisitions and has ample opportunities for internal growth. Essentially, mature businesses in the US and Western Europe where cash flow significantly outstrips spending requirements fund growth in emerging markets with ample cash left over for balance sheet improvement and shareholders. Crown will spend roughly $150MM in both 2007 and 2008 against D&A of $225MM. (Thus if CCK earns $1.50 in 2007, cash earnings really are $1.95/share). Part of the reason for this is overbuilding in the 1990’s and part the company’s high degree of conservatism in expensing even major maintenance spending.
Crown actually has a good record of innovation which is important in such a prosaic industry. One example is it’s patented Superend beverage product, which uses 10% less aluminum than rival beverage can ends and also has attractive consumer attributes. Another is its shaped can technology, such as the Heineken keg can. These products boost margins and also help cement relationships with major customers. At the same time, it is highly unlikely that anyone in its competitive set, including plastic packaging, will come up with a breakthrough that truly alters industry dynamics.
Crown and its competitors have been impacted in the past by sharp fluctuations in steel and aluminum prices and the industry has worked hard to lessen the impact. In the steel businesses, Crown negotiates annually with customers on metal pricing. At the recent Bank of America Conference, CEO John Conway noted in talking about higher steel prices, “There’s no reason in our minds why we shouldn’t be successful in pushing through price with our customers.” I would note that Mr. Conway is quite conservative in his observations. In beverage cans (aluminum) globally, it is a passthrough formula.
|Entry||10/05/2007 01:16 PM|
|Any thoughts on the quarter? Numbers seem a little high. Hopefully that is already priced in.|
|Entry||10/05/2007 05:00 PM|
|No special thoughts. Currency should help a lot. I have no insights into the packing season in Europe, which is probably the biggest swing variable.|
|Subject||EV/EBIT seams expensive|
|Entry||10/06/2007 07:47 PM|
|The valuation in an EV/EBIT seems expensive and I don't think even without growth there is an argument with this business that D&A exceeds maitenance cap x as, among other reasons, maintaining competitive position required continued investment|
|Subject||Low tax rate|
|Entry||10/07/2007 09:52 AM|
|I don't think you should look at any one financial ratio in a vacuum: Crown has a low tax rate (mid-20s and cash taxes are lower than reported taxes) and about $600MM in tax loss carryforwards. To your second point, over time I hope that CapX will exceed D&A under this management team as it should lead to accelerated cash flow growth. Even if one assumes that CapX in 2010 rises $70MM more than in my model to equal D&A ($240MM), free cash flow would still be about $2.80/share, which should lead to a mid-$30's stock price. I'll take it.|
|Subject||Third Quarter Results.|
|Entry||10/17/2007 04:16 PM|
|Overall in line despite poor results from European food cans due to a terrible harvest (cold and wet).. A conservative management team sounded highly confident in their ability to pass through higher raw material costs and deliver "an even better 2008" CapX should come in at $160MM in both years, or roughly $60MM less than D&A.|
|Entry||04/18/2008 11:35 AM|
|Excellent Q1 demonstrates continued strong momentum. Although the stock has done pretty well I continue to think that it is a very attractive idea that can appreciate 30-40% from this level over the next couple of years.|