July 10, 2016 - 3:52pm EST by
2016 2017
Price: 49.80 EPS 0 0
Shares Out. (in M): 136 P/E 37.5 32
Market Cap (in $M): 6,763 P/FCF 35 32
Net Debt (in $M): 862 EBIT 345 385
TEV ($): 7,625 TEV/EBIT 22 20
Borrow Cost: Available 0-15% cost

Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.




We are recommending a short position in the shares of Hyatt Hotels Corporation.  We believe the shares trade at a substantial premium to the hotel peer group (PE of 37.5 vs. 18.7x) despite having a lower quality business mix.  Additionally, we believe the industry is near the peak of the cycle while facing secular headwinds from online travel agencies (price transparency eroding brand power/pricing power and increasing customer acquisition costs) and incremental capacity from sources such as Airbnb.  We value the shares at $36.58/share vs. the 7/8/16 closing price of $49.80 implying upside of ~27%.  Our valuation assumes 18.9x multiple on equity free cash flow (ex joint ventures and SBC) + the book value of the joint venture investments and cash as of Q1 2016.


Business Mix/Comparable Company Analysis:  Hyatt trades at a premium to its peer group based on consensus PE estimates: 37.5x forward vs. a median of 18.7x for the peer group (for comparability we use Capitaliq consensus estimates).  While the shares trade at a modest discount to the peer group on an EV/EBITDA basis, 9.6x vs. a median of 10.4x, we believe PE is a more appropriate measure as it better captures cash flows to equity and reflects the impact of differences in business mix on the capital intensity of each business.  We view Marriott, Starwood, and Hilton as the closest peers, as these companies tend to own/operate/manage similar classes of hotels in similar cities.   


Below we provide additional metrics comparing Hyatt and its closest peers. We note that Hyatt generates a smaller percentage of EBITDA from more profitable, less cyclical, higher margin, and less capital intensive fee businesses (Management contracts/Franchising).  This difference in business mix justifies lower multiples for Hyatt given implications around cyclicality and returns on capital, as well as, less cash flow generation per dollar of revenue and EBITDA for Hyatt.

Key Metrics






2015 Fees % of EBITDA





Revenue Forecast





2015 Adjusted EBITDA Margin
















While business mix is also an important driver of Hyatt’s lower return on assets (2.6% vs. 5% – 13% for peers), we believe Hyatt’s lack of relative scale is another driver.  We do not believe Hyatt has been earning its cost of capital as we calculate ROICs consistently below 5%, and even as the industry operates at cyclically high levels we calculate ROIC at ~4%.  The two charts below highlight some of these challenges both in terms of the strength of the member program, aggregate SG&A spend, and SG&A spend per room.

Industry Operating at Peak Levels:  Virtually all demand metrics in the Lodging sector are at or above peak levels, with room nights sold +17% higher than 2007 and room revenues +31% higher than 2007. Below we provide 2 charts from the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Lodging and Macro checklists which paint a bearish picture as we are in year 7 of what has traditionally been a 5-9 year cycle. Hotel occupancies are 66%, the highest levels in 30+ years, and ADRs are 17% above prior cycle peak.  We note that RevPar growth has been decelerating at the same time, suggesting modest erosion in pricing power. Room demand has traditionally tracked closely with both GDP and S&P 500 earnings growth and both correlations have held tightly in the last few years.

Supply/ Secular Challenges:  While supply growth has been somewhat benign at ~0.6% CAGR over the last few years, we note a few challenges for the industry:  1) long term supply growth 2)  supply growth has been much more aggressive in central business districts and in the upscale segments where Hyatt and the larger chains skew 3)  Airbnb adding shadow capacity focused on most profitable cities 4)  OTAs creating price transparency and increasing in relevance as a channel.  We believe low interest rates, the desire to invest in a hard asset in USD, and the EB-5 visa program are all factors that have been supporting excess supply growth.