|Shares Out. (in M):||0||P/E|
|Market Cap (in $M):||5,712||P/FCF|
|Net Debt (in $M):||0||EBIT||0||0|
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
We are recommending a long position in the stub assets of Hochtief (HOT GR) net of its 54% ownership of Leighton Holdings (LEI AU), requiring approximately 2.2 short shares of Leighton for every 1.0 long share of Hochtief. By synthetically creating this stub position, investors have the opportunity to pay essentially nothing for businesses that we believe have a conservative net asset value of at least €2 billion and generate over €10 billion of revenue annually. Hochtief is among the world’s largest commercial construction contracting businesses (minimal to no residential exposure) with a formidable presence in virtually every region of the world, including Turner Construction, which is among the largest in the
At today’s price, Hochtief’s 54% ownership in Leighton Holdings is worth €5.2 billion, over 90% of the market value of Hochtief’s equity value, and with additional adjusted net cash of approximately €600 million, the stub has a negative implied enterprise value. Leighton has leading market share in the booming Asian and Australian commercial and infrastructure contracting markets. Over the past 5 years, Leighton has more than doubled its revenue and nearly tripled its operating profit, and the market has rewarded the Company with a 600% total return over the five year time period and 185% total return YTD. For the purposes of our analysis, we will not delve into much more detail on Leighton as it is not part of the stub value, and trades at rather high growth multiples of 14.2x TTM EBITDA, 12.1x price to tangible book value, and 1.3x EV/revenue. Before walking through our valuation of the various businesses included in the stub, the chart below shows the implied valuation of the stub at today’s prices.
|HOT GR Stub valuation (MM Euros)|
|HOT GR Market Value||5,712.9|
|less 54% own of LEI AU||5,294.8|
|HOT GR stub net value||418.1|
|Adjusted Net cash||-600.0|
|Stub Enterprise value||-181.9|
|based on HOT GR stock price of €85.12 and LEI AU price of $55.90|
In recent years, Hochtief has established itself as one of the leading airport managers in the growing market for airport privatizations. Hochtief’s current portfolio consists of interests in 6 airports, including the recently acquired 75.0% interest in
Hochtief’s Development segment designs, builds and operates other infrastructure projects (non airport) through its PPP (public-private partnership) Solutions group, including positions in a handful of toll roads, schools, and hospitals, among other investments. The PPP Solutions projects can be valued on an NPV basis similar to the airport portfolio. The 2Q 07 report estimates that the NPV of the portfolio was €260.7 million as of June 30, 2007. €214 million of the total is attributable to the Company’s toll road portfolio, which is discounted at a rate of 12.1%. This value is expected to grow by over €200 million as the Company takes over two toll road contracts in
Hochtief’s Construction Services Americas segment has leading market share in the construction and infrastructure markets in the
Hochtief’s Construction Services Europe is the Company’s oldest legacy contracting business, providing building construction, civil and structural engineering services to select European countries, including Germany, which represents slightly more than half of this segment’s revenue, and the Czech Republic, Poland, and Russia, which comprise the majority of remaining revenue. Over the trailing twelve months, this segment has generated in excess of €2 billion in revenue, but has seen its margins turn negative from a very difficult operating environment in
The chart below provides a summary of our valuation of each of these segments, and subtracts corporate overhead at an 8x multiple:
Value (€ MM) Airports
NPV and EBIT multiples
580 Construction Services Americas
8x TTM EBIT
650 Construction Services Europe
assumes no value
0 Corporate overhead
8x FY 08E
-560 Total Implied Stub Value
1,914 Current Implied Stub Enterprise Value
market values less net cash
-182 Unreflected Value
Summary of Thesis:
At a negative implied enterprise value of the stub relative to billions of euros of actual underlying value, we believe the opportunity is extremely compelling. We believe our stub valuation of just under €2 billion is well on the conservative side, and in fact think the value could be as much as twice our valuation estimates. We are also confident that the underlying value of the stub assets will continue to grow, and are particularly optimistic about the Company’s growing capital allocation to the infrastructure sector. We are confident that this value will eventually be at least somewhat reflected in the respective share prices. Additionally, though there is no guarantee that the implied stub value cannot fall further, there is clearly considerable downside protection at the current implied negative stub value. At current pricing, the enterprise value of the stub is negative for the first time in over three years, and in the meantime, the underlying economic value of the stub has grown considerably, primarily due to the value created by the infrastructure investments.
Though the stub arbitrage is not likely to be fully unlocked by asset monetization or spin offs in the near term (for reasons mentioned below), it is highly likely that the sell side analysts that follow the name will continue to revise their target prices on Hochtief upward to reflect the recent increase in Leighton’s price. The sum of the parts valuation methodology used by sell side analysts for Hochtief value the Leighton component based on Leighton’s stock price, but they also don’t update their models/reports all that frequently, so after big moves in Leighton’s stock price, there is typically a lag in target price adjustments. Some of the sell side reports that we’ve seen even use a weighted average price over a certain time period, so the lagged effect is even greater. UBS, for example, prices Leighton’s value at an average price over the previous four months, and as of their latest report on August 22nd, this price was just north of $40 (AUD) per share. At today’s price of over $55 AUD per share, this 35%+ price difference alone would imply an incremental value of approximately €21 per share in Hochtief’s value. We believe the weighted average methodology is inherently flawed, particularly when you can currently short Leighton at a much higher price than what is reflected in this methodology (in the upward pricing environment for Leighton). It’s also worth noting that Hochtief’s 54% ownership should theoretically get a premium to minority shares traded in the market, as was the case when Custodia sold its 25% ownership interest in Hochtief for a 5% premium to the stock price at the time, and this wasn’t even a controlling majority position.
Over the long term, we believe that some component of this arbitrage will eventually be monetized or spun off, but in the meantime, we believe the growing investment appetite for the privatized infrastructure segment will eventually drive the stub value. Hochtief has strategically positioned itself as a pioneer in this category, and will continue to build on one of the of the most valuable infrastructure portfolios in the world.
As can be seen above, there is little doubt that the stub is being considerably underpriced by the market. Although this value is near historical lows at a negative adjusted enterprise value, it appears that the stub has rarely if ever been fairly valued. Furthermore, though certainly never out of the question, it doesn’t appear that the Company is working toward unlocking this value in the near term. There is fairly strong demand for their infrastructure assets in both the private and public markets, so a spin off or sale of those assets could be easily completed. This appeared more likely when Custodia auctioned off their 25% ownership in Hochtief at €72 per share in March of 2007. At the time, there was considerable anticipation that the winning bidder would use its acquired influence to break up parts of the Company to unlock the stub value, but this was followed by disappointment when the winning bidder was a Spanish based contracting business (ACS) that was apparently looking to expand its geographical footprint in the contracting business rather than unlock the underlying value of its infrastructure assets.
As the ratio of Hochtief value divided by Leighton value has decreased over time, the holding cost of entering the stub trade has become increasingly more burdensome. As an example, at the beginning of 2007, the trade required just over €2 of Hochtief for every €1 of Leighton to create the synthetic position of over €1, but this ratio has now declined to roughly 1.11, and therefore €1.11 of Hochtief is required for every €1 short of Leighton to create just an €0.11 position in the stub. It’s also worth pointing out that with the increased total capital required to enter the trade, the investment is subject to greater short term price fluctuations in the underlying positions. The stocks never trade at the same time, and although the daily correlation has been 0.91 over the trailing twelve months, there are days when the relative performance of the two diverges quite a bit.
|show sort by|
Are you sure you want to close this position Hochtief?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Hochtief for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".