|Shares Out. (in M):||0||P/E|
|Market Cap (in $M):||500||P/FCF|
|Net Debt (in $M):||0||EBIT||0||0|
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
We believe that Titan International is an interesting risk/reward for 2007, albeit with some potential short term issues. Guidance for 2007 points to a double digit free cash flow yield, with potential for further upside linked to a potential ethanol-fuelled boom in agricultural equipment in the US over the next couple of years, synergies to come from two recent acquisitions, a favorable mix shift from greater penetration of the aftermarket channel and some hidden value on the balance sheet. The near term downside is that inventory de-stocking by Deere could make Q4 2006 projections tough to achieve.
Background: Titan was written up last year by evan73, whose writeup I highly recommend. The writeup and thread from last year contains a lot of good information on the company and industry. Titan manufactures wheels, tires and assemblies for the agricultural (~64% sales) Earthmoving/Construction (~23% sales) and Consumer (~13%) segments. The company’s website lays out the various end markets so I will pass on that here. The company has been rolling up wheel and tires businesses (strictly off-highway) in the
In conversations with the company I have been told that the OEM/Aftermarket mix is roughly 85/15 for wheels and 40/60 for tires. The tire estimate is borne out by data on the agricultural market for 2005 from www.moderntiredealer.com. The primary competitors are Bridgestone/Firestone in Agriculture and in construction/OTR (OTR = “off-the-road”) Bridgestone/Firestone, Goodyear and Michelin. We believe that recent events (shortage of mining tires, Goodyear strike) have allowed Titan to further penetrate the more lucrative aftermarket channel, which should reduce dependence on cyclical and lower-margin OEM sales.
Titan has a superior union deal in its facilities courtesy of a multi-year strike a few years back, which Morry estimates saves him up to $10/hour on labor costs vs his competition due to no pension or OPEB costs (a similar situation to Wilbur Ross in the steel business), and additional workforce rationalization. This makes him a natural consolidator of assets from other tire and wheel manufacturers. In many cases, the facilities tend to be orphans within larger organizations that are more focused on producing the equipment or on consumer tire production (Goodyear, Continental et al.). Given Titan’s pure focus on Agricultural and OTR tires, and its inherently lower labor costs, the company claims to be a more efficient user of assets than its competitors for whom these markets are an afterthought. The company claims to have made most of its acquisitions at a significant discount to replacement cost. A history of the firm’s acquisitions is available at http://www.titan-intl.com/heritage.html. The company has five operating manufacturing facilities including the recently acquired
Since last year the stock has bounced between about $17 and $20 but the business itself has moved along nicely, with the integration of the two acquistions. There have been headwinds too – input cost increases linked to oil and steel, partially offset by price increases, extra costs carried while the
New market opportunities.
Titan’s recent acquisitions of Goodyear and Continental’s facilities has opened up a few new opportunities for the company
– Significant opportunity in mining tires in the
– Opportunity to leverage the fixed assets at
– Using leverage from the shortage of mining and OTR tires and the Goodyear strike to sign longer term supply agreements (recently Deere and Grove) and further penetrate the aftermarket
– Expanded presence through Goodyear dealers
Probably the most important initiatives are the expansion of the OTR production, which is expected to occur over the next 4-5 months as molds and tooling are moved, production is qualified at Freeport, and equipment is shipped from the idled Brownsville and Natchez facilities to Freeport and Bryan to optimize and increase production. While some benefits have already shown, the full results of all of these initiatives won’t be seen for a few quarters yet, based on comments on the last call that equipment installations would take 5 months or so. Management has said that it takes 18-24 months to realize operating efficiencies at each acquired facility (headcount reductions, operating processes, moving equipment, repricing product lines and so forth).
Macro - potential agricultural equipment upcycle.
The real kicker for Titan is the effect that rising corn, wheat and soy prices driven by increased ethanol production and worldwide protein consumption should have on the sales of agricultural equipment. Farm income tends to drive sales of farm equipment, and the recent boom in commodity prices could be the start in a multi-year upcycle for farm equipment. Apart from sales of compact tractors, new equipment sales for most farm equipment is down substantially from what was admittedly a huge peak in 1997.
Equipment 1997 Units 2005 Units (Decrease)/Increase
4WD Tractors 8,295 4,235 -49%
Combine Harvester 12,990 8,225 -37%
>100HP 28,355 23,625 -17%
<40HP 55,700 135,380 143%
Source: Titan/Stark’s Truck & Off Highway Ledger
If the current run in farm commodities does push sales of farm equipment, Titan has two ways to win –increased sales of new equipment with their wheels and tires, and the increased utilization/consumption of tires on existing equipment, allied to increased penetration of the aftermarket channel.
Several analysts covering Deere have put out pieces on this issue, including Bear Stearns and Stifel Nicholas. The Stifel piece is interesting in that it compares equipment sales with crop prices and points out that the equipment sales tend to follow with a two year lag. That could bode well for late 2007 and onward. Issambres recent post on CSY speaks to the same thoughts.
Titan has a certain amount of “other” assets that have to be taken into account in the valuation – Evan73’s writeup covers these in more detail, but there have been some changes over the last year.
– 15.4% stock ownership interest in Titan Europe Plc. recorded as an available-for-sale security, worth about $50MM. (Titan has not shown an inclination to sell this yet, though they do receive dividends).
– Note receivable from Titan Europe of $5.6MM.
– Assets held for sale of over $15MM (depreciated book value) which the company states to be worth a premium at market values (but which are still being depreciated). These assets are being marketed, but there is no indication as to when they will be sold. $10-$12MM of the assets will be put back into service at the operating facilities in lieu of purchasing new equipment.
– There appears to be a high level of working capital – partly due to recent acquisitions, partly due to rising input costs. Aftermarket sales in the fourth quarter should bring inventories back down in line, but again this is a situation that may not fully normalize until 2007.
Cash Flow greater than Earnings.
Capex has been quite low the last few years – about $5MM so far this year, $6.8 in 2005, $4.3 the year before that. Management estimates maintenance needs in the $6MM range, but I will use $10MM. Depreciation has run in the mid $20MM range, but going forward should be closer to $30MM run-rate, adjusted for the new
Finally, Jana (owns ~20%) has been buying, adding about 218k shares to its position when the stock fell below $17. I don’t mean to infer too much from this point, but at the least you would have to say that it’s not a negative.
Titan’s issued or goals for 2006 and 2007 revenue and EBITDA in early August, but given Deere’s subsequent comments on working down inventory I think 2006’s may be a reach, so I have used the low end ($720MM revenue, $75MM EBITDA) and knocked them down slightly. 2007 should not be affected (inventory should have normalized) so I used the midpoint of the goals for that. Could Titan’s guidance for 2007 be aggressive? It seems reasonable based on the $470 2005 run-rate for “legacy” Titan, plus the $340 of acquired sales = $810MM. The fall in Ag sales from 05 to 06 should correct in 07. Potential upside from mining tires, new SKUs etc could drive sales further. The August press release stated “Titan currently has excess capacity and has the possibility to increase the output volume of OTR tires by a minimum of 30 percent over the next 12 months”. That should mean $38MM in extra OTR tire sales, before any price increases. $815MM revenue seems reasonable. 13.5% margins on the improved mix (to higher margin aftermarket and OTR) plus price increases compare to 12% in 2004.
For 2008, I have grown revenues from 2007 by $30MM for increased OTR tire production, and used a 15% EBITDA margin. In conversations with management they have indicated that they feel that this is very achievable (and far below their ultimate goal in the 20s), and given the shift in mix, stabilizing input costs, increased operating leverage and recent cost and staff cuts, and the planned introduction of whole new wheel and tire assemblies (particularly in OTR, where Morry claims the basic design is decades behind other wheel/tire technology) 15% seems very achievable.
I have bumped Capex to about 10mm/yr to allow for increased number of facilities, though this is nearly twice what Morry estimates as maintenance capex. Titan has guided to about $8MM extra capex in 2007 for new equipment etc, so I use $18MM.
Interest is increased for the Continental debt, though reducing working capital and sale of any of the assets outlined above should allow for aggressive debt paydown.
Interest includes a little under $4.3MM per year for the converts which should go away in 2009, though the share count used is fully diluted for the conversion. It is appropriate to just gross up the remaining convert interest payments, tax affect and treat them as debt. I estimate 4.3x3 = $13mm*(1-38%) = $8mm. I have reduced interest payments accordingly to get to a “run-rate” interest number. I reduce this in 2008 for debt paydown.
I have left out “other income” which is substantially dividends received from Titan Europe
2005A 2006E 2007E 2008E
Revenue 470 725 815 815
EBITDA 52.6 70 110 124
Capex 6.8 10.0 18.0 10.0
EBITDA-Capex 35.4 60 92 114
Free Cash Flow Calculation
2005A 2006E 2007E 2008E
EBITDA 52.6 70 110 127
D&A 20.7 27.7 30.0 30.0
Interest 8.6 16.6 14.0 11.0
Taxes (38%) 9.8 25.1 32.6
Net Income 15.9 40.9 53.2
Add D&A 27.7 30.0 30.0
Less Capex 10.0 18.0 10.0
FCF 33.6 52.9 73.2
Titan has $81.2 million of 5.25% senior unsecured convertible notes are due 2009. These notes have a conversion price of $13.50 per common share. I adjust the market cap and debt for this conversion.
Shares Outstanding 26.1 (pro forma for the effect of the convertible)
Stock Price 19.00
Market Cap $495 MM
Add Convert interest 8MM
Adj Market Cap 503MM
Assets held for sale $5MM (book value, ex-reused portion)
Debt (ex-convert) $180MM
2006E 2007E 2008E
EV/EBITDA 9.0x 5.7x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA-Capex 10.5x 6.8x 5.4x
FCF Yield 6.7% 10.5% 14.5%
If you subtract the value of the $15MM of assets held for sale at book and the $50MM value of Titan Europe from the market cap, the FCF yield looks even better.
So what could TWI be worth? If you take my 2008 FCF number, use a 10-12 multiple, add back Titan Europe plus the assets held for sale, you get $29-$35 per FD share.
– Depreciation and amortization is currently greater than maintenance capex as discussed above. This is clearly going to normalize eventually, but even with D&A = Capex it’s a double digit yield in 2008.
– I have left working capital at its current level, though I expect it to fall.
– The above does not account for any further acquisitions by Titan. Morry has hinted that there will be more to come, and evan73 went over what some of the potential candidates could be in his writeup.
· The awaited agricultural boom fails to come to the benefit of the OEMs. Deere is cautious on 2007, despite analyst bullishness, and Morry Taylor has said that 2006 was softer for agricultural equipment than he expected. The USDA is raising farm income estimates though, and the 2007 Farm Bill is expected to have incentives for renewable energy.
· Titan’s business is seasonal (bias to Q1 and Q2) and lumpy. Morry Taylor also runs the business with a view to the long term, which can result in quarterly earnings volatility.
· We think that Q4 may be a bit rough as a result of Deere working down inventory in the channel, but that should not affect 2007. It may make sense to wait until 2006 numbers are out, with the risk that the good news for 2007 may be baked in at that point.
· GAAP earnings trail cashflow, and the company is unlikely to sell its Titan Europe shares so the company will not screen as well on straight P/E
· Morry Taylor’s rough edges can be too much for some investors (not very complimentary about our foreign friends).
· Little analyst coverage (Oppenheimer). We don’t expect this to change.
· Extreme falloff in the construction industry could take away some of the upside (we think that the tight mining market will offset this).
· My margin estimates for 2007/8 could be aggressive – beaten to death above, and below company’s LT goals.
· Imports – OEMs could use seek to import more of the high-volume specialized tires and wheels. Cost of importing such large low-margin items should provide some margin of safety on this issue.
|show sort by|
Are you sure you want to close this position Titan International?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Titan International for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".