| 2013 | 2014 | ||||||
| Price: | 1.33 | EPS | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| Shares Out. (in M): | 107 | P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
| Market Cap (in $M): | 142 | P/FCF | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
| Net Debt (in $M): | 4 | EBIT | 0 | 100 | |||
| TEV ($): | 146 | TEV/EBIT | 0.0x | 1.4x | |||
Veris Gold (TSX: VG , Pink Sheets: YNGFF), formerly known as Yukon-Nevada Gold (YNG) and the subject of several prior VIC posts under that name, is a small cap US-Canadian gold mining firm that has undergone a sharp recent selloff after raising capital at a premium to current prices, with the stock being more than cut in half since November despite several positive fundamental developments including production and reserve growth, a significant decrease in cash operating costs, and the recent execution of several toll milling agreements that should deliver additional net cash cost savings going forward. After a brief recent rally, VG has now given up all of its gains in the sector-wide selloff and now trades near an all-time low, with attractive valuations to forward cash flows and to the value of its ore processing assets and gold reserves, and a deep discount to recent secondary offerings and insider buying.
In addition to more than 1.06 million ounces of proven and probable gold reserves at its 119 square mile Jerritt Canyon mining claim in Nevada, Veris owns an extensive complex of ore processing and roasting facilities adjacent to its Nevada mines, which has a reported replacement cost of over $1 billion USD. After protracted operating problems following a 2008 shutdown, the company has invested heavily in capital improvements (including $210 million in capex in 2012 alone), and is now finally beginning to show significant production and cost improvements that have not yet been recognized by the stock price. To take advantage of substantial unused processing capacity, the company has recently initiated a series of toll milling agreements with nearby third party mines that are expected to substantially lower Veris' net cash costs of gold production going forward.
Jerritt Canyon mines historically produced from 150,000 to 350,000 ounces of gold per year from 1990 through 2007, before operations were suspended by the EPA in 2008 due to excessive mercury emissions. The former management team was replaced, and after extensive investments in environmental remediation and facility upgrades, the company reached a consent decree with the EPA allowing mining to resume. Protracted technical and operating issues following the return to production made achieving target costs and production volumes much slower than anticipated, requiring several capital raises and severely pressuring the stock price. Following substantial investments in Veris by investors including Deutsche Bank and Eric Sprott, over $210 million of additional capital was deployed for plant and mine capital improvements in 2012 alone -- an amount which itself is now far in excess of Veris’ total market cap after the recent decline. Gold production has finally begun to increase significantly from 13,200 ounces in the first quarter of 2012 to 35,500 ounces and 31,700 ounces in the latest two quarters, and management is targeting annual production in the range of 175,000 to 185,000 ounces for 2013.
The company’s recently enhanced ore processing and roasting facilities now have significant unused capacity, which is projected to create operating leverage as ore extraction continues to ramp up with exploitation of the Starvation Canyon mine at the Jerritt Canyon property. Total permitted processing capacity of 6000 tons per day is still significantly in excess of the company’s 3300 tpd of internal requirements. Management has pointed to the potential for additional cash flows from toll milling performed on behalf of multiple nearby Nevada mining operations including Atna Resources, Klondex, Barrick, and Newmont, which are currently capacity constrained and accumulating stockpiles of unprocessed ore. With operating improvements at Jerritt Canyon, Veris’ cash costs per ounce have already declined from a prohibitive $1654 per ounce during the severe operational problems in Q1 2012 to $1038 in the latest quarter, before additional efficiencies from production at Starvation Canyon and before considering cash from toll milling. Management expects that after the effects of cash from toll milling agreements, net cash costs to Veris could reach $575 per ounce this year, and analysts have projected 2013 EBITDA in excess of $100 million. I'll attach a table showing the approximate sensitivity to a range of possible assumptions below:
| production (thousand oz) | net cash costs (USD/oz) | gold price (USD/oz) | OCF (USD thousands) |
| 125 | 575 | 1200 | 78125 |
| 125 | 750 | 1200 | 56250 |
| 125 | 1000 | 1200 | 25000 |
| 150 | 575 | 1400 | 123750 |
| 150 | 750 | 1400 | 97500 |
| 150 | 1000 | 1400 | 60000 |
| 180 | 575 | 1600 | 184500 |
| 180 | 750 | 1600 | 153000 |
| 180 | 1000 | 1600 | 108000 |
Management and incentives
Although any forward projections about junior mining companies need to be taken with a generous grain of salt, management actions on behalf of their personal accounts may be somewhat more informative. Filings excavated from the cumbersome Canadian regulatory website http://sedi.ca reveal that multiple insiders bought over 80,000 shares on the open market during December, in addition to heavy buying in mid 2012 by multiple insiders including director and former CEO Bob Baldock. Veris Chairman Francois Marland owns an 8.8% block of common stock; together with this significant stock ownership by management, the 11% stakes of large shareholders Sprott and Deutsche Bank should bring added discipline to capital allocation going forward.
Asset Value
With recent exploration offsetting production, proven and probable reserves at Jerritt Canyon increased to 1.061 million ounces in the latest technical report, and total measured and indicated resource was 2.3 million ounces -- an attractive valuation on the $142 million market cap even before considering the value of ore processing assets. Veris additionally owns a mining complex at Ketza River in the Yukon Territory, purchased from a third party in 1997 after a prolonged period of low gold prices in the $200s made further operations uneconomic. Measured and indicated gold reserves at the site total 418,000 ounces. The company has begun the repermitting process but is currently not investing significant additional capital. With relatively little development risk and extensive infrastructure already in place, this property could be a source of significant free upside optionality to any recovery in gold prices; and an eventual sale to a third party could take advantage of the still very significant rise in gold prices since its initial 1997 purchase.
Analyzing the relative attractiveness of resource investments as an inflation hedge
Mining stocks overall have recently experienced a prolonged period of historically extreme underperformance, and have underperformed spot gold prices significantly on a relative basis even during the recent selloff. The chart below shows the XAU (Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index) relative to the spot price of gold, a ratio which now stands near an all time low. As John Hussman highlighted with a recent backtest on 35 years of data, the ratio of spot gold prices to the XAU has shown a strong inverse correlation with subsequent 4-year returns from gold stocks. Interestingly, the current ratio would be consistent with a predicted 4-year change in the XAU of more than +50%.
http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc130415.htm
To the extent that much of this discount results from persistently lower investor tolerance for uncertainty and illiquidity following the credit crisis, exacerbated by capitulation of investors following the recent decline in spot gold, today’s very low relative valuations may signal a timely entry point for contrarian investors. However, one alternate explanation for the recent relative underperformance of miners would be that the market is anticipating that capital equipment and exploration costs may increase by more than the price of gold, justifying a much higher discount rate for junior miners. Investors considering natural resource stocks as an inflation hedge also need to consider the impact of inflation on future capital costs and development expenses that have not yet been incurred; particularly for early-stage exploration and development companies, future development and extraction of resources can benefit from inflation only to the extent that the relative increase in price of the resource being produced exceeds the increased price of future capital investments and operating costs needed to produce it.
In the case of Veris, the very high replacement costs of already completed investments in mining and processing infrastructure represent a significant hidden asset which could create disproportionate benefits for shareholders if either or both of gold prices and development costs increase in future. The ongoing devastation across the junior mining sector is now causing a lack of access to capital that is likely to curtail further investment in the kinds of large-scale roasting and processing facilities currently owned by VG. With nearby miners sitting on stockpiles of unprocessed ore and unwilling to invest in new processing capacity, VG's existing assets will be well positioned to create value for shareholders by providing a way for capital-constrained miners to generate much needed cash.
Veris stock now trades at a nearly 40% discount to its recently completed December secondary offering at $2.10, which when combined with growing cash flows from operations finally appears to have satisfied the need for further capital. Short selling as a hedge by holders of Veris warrants and convertible bonds may have exacerbated the recent share price decline. After considering the attractive valuations to forward cash flows and proven and probable gold reserves, the deep discount to replacement value of infrastructure assets, and recent insider buying above the current price, Veris stock appears an attractive way for contrarian value investors to add exposure to gold at advantageous prices. I have recently added VG and YNGFF shares near $1.30.
| Subject | Good investment idea, but this write-up has issues |
| Entry | 04/27/2013 08:00 PM |
| Member | aagold |
Such as, you didn't even say what you think the stock is worth, and why. Isn't that the basic question every value investor wants answered? I think the equity is worth around $4.20/share at $1,450 gold, although I admit I'm not done with my analysis yet (I'm using a 10% discount rate for my DCF analysis).
Your share count of 107M leaves out all the options and warrants, and if the stock appreciates to fair value many of them will be in the money. I'd say there are more like 135M shares outstanding, but if those options/warrants are exercised there will also be $97M more in cash.
You say that $210M of capital was raised for plant and mine capital improvement, and you note that amount exceeds the current market cap, but that's flawed logic because much of the raised capital was *debt*, not equity. The Deutsche Bank forward sale agreement is effectively a form of debt. There are also gold loan and convertible note liabilities to consider. I'd say there's about $162M of total debt right now.
Where did you get that $183M forecast for future capital expenditures? If that came from the NI-43-101 filed a year ago, then that's very much out of date.
If I become more confident in my analysis then I'll post it later on this thread...
- aagold
| |
| Subject | sugar1 & aagold |
| Entry | 04/28/2013 10:20 AM |
| Member | clancy836 |
Bob Baldock was President and CEO from 2009-2012 and finally stepped down last year, though he still serves as a director and continues to own a lot of stock much of which he bought with his own money. The new President is Robert Chapman who seems fairly experienced with several past CFO positions including Newmont, Apollo Gold, and Barrick. Shaun Heinrichs and Randy Reichert have been acting co-CEOs since mid 2012; I'm not sure how much to blame them for past difficulties (or credit them for recent improvements) but would bet many past shareholders are exasperated with them, and more new blood could go a long way to helping reestablish more normal multiples. François Marland plays an active role as Executive Chairman and as the largest individual stockholder should be reasonably well incentivized which is refreshing in this space. I know that several VIC members have been involved in this name off and on, & would be interested to hear your impressions. I mentioned the requirement to continue to pay down the Deutsche Bank forward sale facility; it would be fair to treat this as debt, capitalizing the total value to which cash from forward sales is below market prices would come to 160k * $850 = $136MM, plus $28MM fair value of remaining forward contracts. The debt component of convertible debentures was reported as $3.7MM but I think face value should be $11MM, they recently issued a $10MM note this month. At YE2012 there were 3.4MM options at an average strike of $3.62 and 3.2MM at $2.08. Over 5 million warrants expired in 2012, and another 3.3MM at $4.4 will expire in May. The remainder are 2015 4MM at $4.40 2015 3.9MM at $4 2015 4MM at $3 2016 3.6MM at $1.95 2018 3.4MM at $1.80 Most of these are pretty far OTM; on a rally to $4.40 there could be a $77 million cash inflow for 25MM shares, but at current levels I'd be happy enough to not lose sleep over this. I was irked to see that the Whitebox warrants had an adjustment provision to $1.95 ; I'm sure they shorted stock instantly on recieving them and made risk-free money all the way down. The $183MM in 4.5-year capex is from the forecast on page 88 of the recent Form 20-F. http://www.verisgold.com/i/pdf/financials/2013-40F-YNG.pdf Relative to the past, the difference is that several of the catalysts are finally starting to demonstrably happen, while the stock is significantly cheaper and has not priced this in. Production has increased substantially, reaching 67 thousand ounces in the last two quarters, and new production started at Starvation Canyon this month. Work on the processing plant is also finally complete, it has been able to handle months of production without shutdowns and toll milling agreements have finally been signed with two outside parties. I think the value obviously changes a lot depending on production, net cash costs, spot gold prices, and what discount rate you choose, so declaring it's definitely worth target price X wouldnt give a fair picture of this uncertainty (though it could get me a job as a sell-side analyst). After looking at scenarios for spot gold prices, net cash costs, and production over a reasonable range of values between observable current numbers and management projections, I think VG should be able to meet liabilities and deliver attractive returns over a range of outcomes. | |
| Subject | RE: sugar1 & aagold |
| Entry | 04/28/2013 06:19 PM |
| Member | aagold |
Clancy,
Thanks for your detailed response, I think your answers were useful.
Regarding valuation, I guess we have a difference of philosophy. I don't expect anybody to say a stock is *definitely* worth anything, but I certainly do think it's useful to state your estimated NAV/share of this mining company using stated parameters (e.g., gold price, annual production, oz of reserves/resources in the ground, cash costs, discount rate, etc.) and also to provide a sensitivity analysis so people can see how the NAV changes under various parameter assumptions. Having said that, I do realize you're not getting paid anything to write this up, so I guess it's a bit presumptuous of me to ask you to do more work!
- aagold | |
| Subject | Ugh |
| Entry | 05/15/2013 02:39 PM |
| Member | aagold |
Anybody care to comment on the wonderful news released today? The stock is down around 22% last time I checked. I think this stock has kicked me in the head so many times at this point that I'm just immune to the pain... | |
| Subject | RE: Clancy |
| Entry | 08/28/2013 12:10 PM |
| Member | clancy836 |
PPS performance has obviously been horrible so far, making me the 4th VIC member to get hammered by a premature YNG/VG recommendation. After the continuing selloff in spot gold prices and more operating disappointments earlier in the year, to strengthen the balance sheet they closed yet another offering of 8.5mm units at $0.52 with 4.25mm warrants at $0.60, again causing frustrating dilution. The decrease in spot gold prices will limit their cash flow, but it appears they should be able to deliver against their DB gold facility as long as forecasted production levels are achieved going forward. Throughout all of this, open market buying by multiple insiders has continued to be very substantial. http://canadianinsider.com/node/7?menu_tickersearch=vg The last of the former management team has now been replaced; I am hoping operating performance will be more consistent going forward but clearly haven't been able to forecast this accurately. They have succeeded in adding multiple toll milling agreements to take advantage of their large roasting facility, net cash costs per ounce should decline further from the recent $1066 ; new management projects $850 by year end, but it's a hard assumption to make given their history. They appear to have reserved appropriately for environmental liabilities, though this could make potential acquirers prefer toll milling as you say. VG actually earned $0.09 in the latest quarter, but this was entirely attributable to valuation gains from their forward gold contracts and I wouldn't put any weight on it. Assuming annual production of 145k to 155k ounces, spot gold price of $1300; and net cash costs of $1000 would imply OCF of around $45MM annually, with sensitivity of around $15MM to a $100 change in gold prices or net cash costs per ounce holding production constant, and sensitivity of $2MM to a 10,000 ounce change in production holding price and cost constant. In making a contrarian foray into VG or any junior gold stock, I clearly underestimated the impact of factors like spot gold prices and mine-specific technical issues that I have no edge in forecasting. (It might be that nobody actually has an edge in this, but certainly not me.) I've kept total gold-related exposure under 4% of the portfolio so overall performance was not that affected, but I wish I hadn't recommended it and apologize for the bad outcome so far. Sector-wide sentiment still seems very negative, and there has been heavy insider buying in many of these stocks during continued poor share price performance. Given the ongoing insider buying, terrible sentiment toward the sector, and large upside optionality to an unlooked-for rally in gold prices given the reserves and extensive roasting/processing assets, I think it's reasonable to have some exposure and I continue to own it. Realistically, I should acknowledge this is not an area where I have a unique edge or ability to forecast operating outcomes, and instead begin to focus more on areas where I may have unique knowledge that others do not. | |